Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Boise Cascade Corp. v. United States

429 F.2d 426

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1970-08-31
Topic: litigation

PER CURIAM: For the reasons stated by the District Judge in his opinion, Boise Cascade Corporation v. United States, D. Idaho, 1968, 288 F.Supp. 770, the judgment should be, and it is Affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Boise Cascade Corp. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES,429 F.2d 426(9th Cir. 1970)

BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of

America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 23656.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

August 31, 1970.

Rehearing Denied September 29, 1970.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho; Fred M. Taylor, Judge.Page 427

James Berlin (argued), of Eberle Berlin, Boise, Idaho, for appellant.

John S. Brown (argued), Lee A. Jackson, Harry Baum, Stuart A. Smith, Attys., Johnnie Walters, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tax Division, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C.; Jay F. Bates, U.S. Atty., Clarence D. Suiter, Asst. U.S. Atty., Boise, Idaho, for appellee.

Before BARNES, BROWNING and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

For the reasons stated by the District Judge in his opinion, Boise Cascade Corporation v. United States, D. Idaho, 1968,288 F. Supp. 770, the judgment should be, and it is

Affirmed.