Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Bernstein v. United States Department Of Justice

192 F.3d 1308

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1999-09-30
Topic
bankruptcy

192 F.3d 1308 (9th Cir. 1999) DANIEL J. BERNSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; DEPARTMENT OF STATE; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; UNITED STATES ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMAMENT AGENCY; NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY; CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY; MADELINE E. ALBRIGHT, United States Secretary of State; WILLIAM M. DALEY, United States Secretary of Commerce; WILLIAM COHEN, United States Secretary of Defense; KENNETH A.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bernstein v. United States Department Of Justice. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion

192 F.3d 1308 (9th Cir. 1999)

DANIEL J. BERNSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; DEPARTMENT OF STATE; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; UNITED STATES ARMS CONTROL AND DISARMAMENT AGENCY; NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
ENERGY; CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY; MADELINE E. ALBRIGHT, United States Secretary of State; WILLIAM M. DALEY, United States Secretary of Commerce; WILLIAM COHEN, United States Secretary of Defense; KENNETH A. MINIHAN, Director, United States National Security Agency; JOHN B. HOLUM, Director, United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency; WILLIAM G. ROBINSON; GARY M. ONCALE; AMBASSADOR MICHAEL NEWLIN; CHARLES RAY; MARK KORO; GREG STARK; Defendants-Appellants.

No. 97-16686

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Filed September 30, 1999

HUG, Chief Judge:

1

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion, Bernstein v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, 176 F.3d 1132 (9th Cir. 1999), is withdrawn.