Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Bell v. United States

Bell v. United States, 159 F.2d 247 (9th Cir. 1947)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1947-02-04
Topic: bankruptcy

PER CURIAM Upon the authority of Ballard v. United States, 67 S.Ct. 261, the judgments appealed from in the-above entitled case are reversed and the cause remanded to the District Court with instructions to dismiss the indictment.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bell v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

BELL v. UNITED STATES,159 F.2d 247(9th Cir. 1947)

Arthur L. BELL, George Gouverneur Ashwell, Eugene Wadsworth Brown, J. Fred

Burkey, Lawrence Cook, A. Ray Elsea, Ed Gilson, Max-Theodore Miller, Bay

Burns Sharp and Homer G. Wilcox, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America,

Appellee.

No. 10432.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

February 4, 1947.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California, Central Division; Leon R. Yankwich, Judge.

Russell E. Parsons, A.L. Wirin, and Lorrin Andrews, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.

James M. Carter, U.S. Atty., Norman W. Neukom, Asst. U.S. Atty., and William Strong, Sp. Asst. to U.S. Atty., all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Osmond K. Fraenkel and Arthur Garfield Hays, both of New York City, for American Civil Liberties Union, amicus curiæ.

En Banc.

PER CURIAM

Upon the authority of Ballard v. United States, 67 S.Ct. 261, the judgments appealed from in the above entitled case are reversed and the cause remanded to the District Court with instructions to dismiss the indictment.Page 248