Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Allen v. Nelson

484 F.2d 960

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1973-10-09
Topic: general

PER CURIAM: For the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion (see 354 F.Supp. 505), the court’s order is affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Allen v. Nelson. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 7 opinions

ALLEN v. NELSON,484 F.2d 960(9th Cir. 1973)

O. C. ALLEN, PETITIONER-APPELLEE, v. L. S. NELSON, WARDEN,

RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

No. 73-1339.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

October 9, 1973.

Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., Edward A. Hinz, Jr., Chief Asst. Atty. Gen., Doris H. Maier, Edward P. O'Brien, Asst. Attys. Gen., John T. Murphy, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for respondent-appellant.

William Madel, David T. Alexander, Petty, Andrews, Tufts Jackson, San Francisco, Cl., for petitioner-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Oliver J. Carter, Chief Judge.

Before BROWNING, TRASK, and CHOY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

[1] For the reasons stated in the district court's opinion (see354 F. Supp. 505), the court's order is affirmed.Page 973