Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Brooks v. American General Financial Services, Inc.
Brooks v. Am. Gen. Fin. Servs., Inc., 127 S. Ct. 369 (2006)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 2006-10-02
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- "[W]e will not conclude that a district judge shirked her obligation to consider the § 3553(a) factors simply because she did not discuss each one individually!.]”
- “Reasonableness review does not entail the substitution of our judgment for that of the sentencing judge. Rather, the standard is akin to review for abuse of discretion.”
- “In calibrating our review for reasonableness, we will continue to seek guidance from the considered judgment of the Sentencing Commission as expressed in the Sentencing Guidelines and authorized by Congress.”
- “[W]e will not conclude that a district judge shirked her obligation to consider the § 3553(a) factors simply because she did not discuss each one individually or did not expressly parse or address every argument relating to those factors that the defendant advanced.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Brooks v. American General Financial Services, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 58 opinions
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.