Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Arkansas State Highway Employees Local 1315 v. Smith

585 F.2d 876

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1978-10-10
Topic: litigation

PER CURIAM. The Arkansas State Highway Employees Local 1315, and eight individual employees of the Arkansas State Highway Department instituted this action for declaratory and injunctive relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Maurice Smith, Lawrence Blackwell, J. C. Patterson, George Kell and James A. Branyan, individually and as Commissioners of the Arkansas State Highway Commission, and Henry Gray, individually and as Director of the Arkansas State Highway Department.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Arkansas State Highway Employees Local 1315 v. Smith. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

ARKANSAS ST. HIGHWAY EMP. LOCAL 1315, v. SMITH,585 F.2d 876(8th Cir. 1978)

ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY EMPLOYEES LOCAL 1315, JAMES P. ROWELL, ROBERT C.

CONLEY, JAKE FRANKS, EDWIN SHINN, SPENCER Y. LAND, WALTER MAYS, ROBERT

WATSON AND A. D. TATE, APPELLEES, v. MAURICE SMITH, LAWRENCE BLACKWELL, J.

C. PATTERSON, GEORGE KELL AND JAMES A. BRANYAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS

COMMISSIONERS OF THE ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION, AND HENRY GRAY,

INDIVIDUALLY AND AS DIRECTOR OF THE ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT,

APPELLANTS.

No. 78-1188.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted September 14, 1978.

Decided October 10, 1978.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied November 7, 1978.

Friday, Eldredge Clark, Little Rock, Ark. and Tom Keys, Atty., Arkansas State Highway Commission, Little Rock, Ark., for appellants. Appendix was also filed by them.

John T. Lavey, Little Rock, Ark., for appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Before LAY, BRIGHT and ROSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

[1] The Arkansas State Highway Employees Local 1315, and eight individual employees of the Arkansas State Highway Department instituted this action for declaratory and injunctive relief under42 U.S.C. § 1983against Maurice Smith, Lawrence Blackwell, J. C. Patterson, George Kell and James A. Branyan, individually and as Commissioners of the Arkansas State Highway Commission, and Henry Gray, individually and as Director of the Arkansas State Highway Department. The complaint alleged,inter alia,that the refusal of the Commission and the Department to allow Local 1315 to file or initiate grievances on behalf of its members deprived Local 1315 of its right to petition government for the redress of grievances in violation of the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

[2] The circumstances leading up to the present litigation concern Robert Watson and W. E. Hughes, employees of the ArkansasPage 877State Highway Department. Watson was discharged by the Department and Hughes was suspended without pay for five days. Following unsuccessful discussions with their supervisors, each employee sent a letter to Local 1315, explaining the nature of their grievance and requesting the union to process the grievances on their behalf. In each case the union forwarded the employee's letter to the designated employer's representative and included its own letter stating that it represented the employees and desired to set up a meeting. The employer's representative did not respond to the union's letter. Thereafter each employee filed a written complaint directly with the employer representative. Local 1315 represented each employee at subsequent meetings with the employer representative, Watson was notified later that his discharge was justified, while Hughes was advised that his grievance would remain under advisement pending this action.

[3] On cross-motions for summary judgment the district court found that under the grievance procedure the Commission will not consider a grievance unless the employee submits his written complaint directly to the designated employer representative. Relying principally onUnited Mine Workers v. Illinois State BarAssociation,389 U.S. 217,88 S.Ct. 353,19 L.Ed.2d 426(1967), the district court concluded that that portion of the grievance procedure was unconstitutional because it prevents Local 1315 from filing a grievance on behalf of its members.

[4] We agree and affirm the judgment of the district court on the basis of its opinion.

[5] Plaintiffs' counsel is awarded a $300.00 attorney fee on this appeal.

[6] It is so ordered.