Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

National Van Lines, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission

355 F.2d 326

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1966-01-14
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • Noting that the “inadvertent omission” of a brief note in a tariff “does not ipso facto change the meaning of the tariffs. At most, it creates an ambiguity or uncertainty.”
  • if an “inadvertent omission” in a tariff creates “an ambiguity or uncertainty ... the traditional rules of construction of written instruments are controlling in arriving at the proper application of the tariffs”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed National Van Lines, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
35 opinions