Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Mr. Travel, Inc. v. V.I.P. Travel Service, Inc.

Mr. Travel, Inc. v. V.I.P. Travel Serv., Inc., 385 F.2d 420 (7th Cir. 1967)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1967-10-04
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. In this action for trademark infringement and unfair competition, Mr. Travel, Inc. has complained that the defendant travel service infringed the service mark “mr. travel”. The complaint also charged that defendant improperly used a caricature associated with the plaintiff’s mark. The District Court held that there was no infringement or unfair competition. 268 F.Supp. 958.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mr. Travel, Inc. v. V.I.P. Travel Service, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
10 opinions
MR. TRAVEL, INC. v. V.I.P. TRAVEL SERV., INC.,385 F.2d 420(7th Cir. 1967)
MR. TRAVEL, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. V.I.P. TRAVEL SERVICE, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 16077.
United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
October 4, 1967.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division; Bernard M. Decker, Judge.
Max R. Kraus, Chicago, Ill., for appellant.

Edward C. Threedy, Chicago, Ill., for appellee.
Before CASTLE, SWYGERT and CUMMINGS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
In this action for trademark infringement and unfair competition, Mr. Travel, Inc. has complained that the defendant travel service infringed the service mark "mr. travel". The complaint also charged that defendant improperly used a caricature associated with the plaintiff's mark. The District Court held that there was no infringement or unfair competition.268 F. Supp. 958. We agree with the reasoning of the opinion below. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.Page 487