Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Edgewater Hospital, Inc. v. Bowen
866 F.2d 228
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1988-09-15
- Topic
- general
providing that a decision “must strike us as more than just maybe or probably wrong; it must ... strike us as wrong with the force of a five- week-old, unrefrigerated dead fish” | providing that a decision “must strike us as more than just maybe or probably wrong; it must . . . strike us as wrong with the force of a five-week-old, unrefrigerated dead fish” | describing the clearly erroneous standard as follows: “ ‘[M]ore than just maybe or probably wrong; it must *** strike us as wrong with the force of a five-week-old, unrefrigerated dead fish’ ” | describing the clearly erroneous standard as follows: "'[M]ore than just maybe or probably wrong; it must *** strike us as wrong with the force of a five-week-old, unrefrigerated dead fish" | law-of-the-case doctrine compelled finding of market power in replacement parts for single-brand engine | law-of-the-case doctrine compelled finding of market power in replacement parts for single-brand engine | "Ordinarily, matters decided on a prior appeal become the law of the case to be followed on a later appeal.” | "To be clearly erroneous, a decision must . . . strike us as wrong with the force of a five-week-old, unrefrigerated dead fish." | “As a general rule, the [law-of-the-case] doctrine does not extend to issues not presented or decided . . . .” | “As a general rule, the [law of the case] doctrine does not extend to issues not presented or decided . . .” | for an appellate court to reverse under a clearly erroneous standard, the decision must “strike us as wrong with the force of five-week old, unrefrigerated dead fish” | for an appellate court to reverse under a clearly erroneous standard, the decision must “ ‘strike us as wrong with the force of five-week-old, unrefrigerated dead fish’ ” | “To be clearly erroneous, a decision must strike [the Court] as more than just maybe or probably wrong; it must … strike [the Court] as wrong with the force of a five-week-old, unrefrigerated dead fish.” | "To be clearly erroneous, a decision must strike us as more than just maybe or probably wrong; it must . . . strike us as wrong with the force of a five-week-old, unrefrigerated dead fish." | “To be clearly erroneous, a decision must strike [the Court] as more than just maybe or probably wrong; it must . . . strike [the Court] as wrong with the force of a five-week-old, unrefrigerated dead fish.” | “To be clearly erroneous, a decision must strike [the Court] as more than just maybe or probably wrong; it must . . . strike [the Court] as wrong with the force of a five-week-old, unrefrigerated dead fish.” | “[T]o be clearly erroneous, a decision must strike [a court] as more than just maybe or probably wrong; it must . . . strike [the court] as wrong with the force of a five-week- old, unrefrigerated dead fish.”
Citator
- Cited by
- 88 opinions
[3] Page 1134, first full sentence at top of col. 2 should be modified to read as follows:
Third, we hold that, since the Board has jurisdiction to review any matter covered by the cost report at issue,see42 U.S.C. § 1395oo(d);BethesdaHospital [Ass'n v. Bowen,___ U.S. ___] 108 S.Ct. [1255] at 1259 [99 L.Ed.2d 460(1988)], it certainly has jurisdiction to review the properly claimed cost items of Edgewater Hospital.
- Honorable Robert A. Grant, Senior District Judge for the Northern District of Indiana, is sitting by designation. ↩