PER CURIAM. This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and argument of counsel, and it appearing there was no clear mistake or abuse of judicial discretion in the orders appealed from, entered December 6, 1938, rejecting the plan of reorganization as proposed by the debtor corporation under section 77B of the Bankruptcy Act as amended, 11 U.S.C.A. § 207, (Price v. Spokane Silver & Lead Company, 8 Cir., 97 F.2d 237; In re Youtie, 3 *1023Cir., 44 F.2d 56; In re Granville & Winthrop Bldg. Corporation, 7 Cir., 87 F.2d 101; Wayne United Gas Company v. Owens-Illinois Glass Company et al., 4 Cir., 91 F.2d 827), and it further appearing that the sua sponte order of the court making the Securities & Exchange Commission a party to these proceedings pursuant to the provisions of the Act of June 22, 1938, Public Act No. 696, chap. 10, Sec. 208 of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended, 11 U.S.C.A. § 608, and the appointment of Paul E.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Wilton Realty Corp. v. Weadock. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
WILTON REALTY CORPORATION v. WEADOCK,106 F.2d 1022(6th Cir. 1939)
WILTON REALTY CORPORATION, Debtor, and Equitable Trust Company, as
Trustee, Intervenor, Appellants, v. Paul E. WEADOCK, as Examiner,
Securities And Exchange Commission, Bondholders' Protective Committee of
"The Wilton" Building Bond Issue, Michigan Public Trust Commission,
Appellees.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan; Arthur F. Lederle, Judge.
Affirming order30 F. Supp. 486.
Lewis Daniels and George E. Brand, both of Detroit, Mich., for appellants.
Paul Weadock, of Detroit, Mich., Joseph L. Weiner and Robert H. Winn, both of Washington, D.C., C.J. Odenweller, Jr., of Chicago, Ill., and Noble T. Lawson and Irving Small, both of Detroit, Mich., for appellees.
Before ALLEN, HAMILTON, and ARANT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and argument of counsel, and it appearing there was no clear mistake or abuse of judicial discretion in the orders appealed from, entered December 6, 1938, rejecting the plan of reorganization as proposed by the debtor corporation under section 77B of the Bankruptcy Act as amended, 11 U.S.C.A. § 207, (Price v. Spokane Silver Lead Company, 8 Cir.,97 F.2d 237; In re Youtie, 3Page 1023Cir.,44 F.2d 56; In re Granville Winthrop Bldg. Corporation, 7 Cir.,87 F.2d 101; Wayne United Gas Company v. Owens-Illinois Glass Company et al., 4 Cir.,91 F.2d 827), and it further appearing that the sua sponte order of the court making the Securities Exchange Commission a party to these proceedings pursuant to the provisions of the Act of June 22, 1938, Public Act No. 696, chap. 10, Sec. 208 of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended, 11 U.S.C.A. § 608, and the appointment of Paul E. Weadock, Examiner, pursuant to the Act of June 22, 1938, chap. 575,52 Stat. 890, 11 U.S.C.A. § 568, has not resulted in injury to the debtor (Bache v. Louisiana Oil Refining Corporation, 5 Cir.,97 F.2d 445; In re 620 Church Street Corporation,299 U.S. 24,27,57 S.Ct. 88,81 L.Ed. 16), it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the order appealed from be and it is in all things affirmed.Page 149