Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

William B. Tanner Company, Inc. v. United States

William B. Tanner Co. v. United States, 575 F.2d 101 (6th Cir. 1978)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1978-05-15
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • order “granting summary judgment in favor of [one defendant] but not adjudicating the liability of other defendants” is not a final judgment without a Rule 54(b) certification that the order is a final judgment

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed William B. Tanner Company, Inc. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
119 opinions
WILLIAM B. TANNER CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES,575 F.2d 101(6th Cir. 1978)
WILLIAM B. TANNER COMPANY, INC., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.
No. 76-2367.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Argued April 14, 1978.
Decided May 15, 1978.
Elijah Noel, Jr., Louis R. Lucas, Ratner, Sugarmon, Lucas Salky, G. Philip Arnold, Memphis, Tenn., for plaintiff-appellant.

J. Michael Cody, U.S. Atty., Memphis, Tenn., Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Gilbert Andrews, Tax Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Myron C. Baum,Page 102Crombie J.D. Garrett, John G. Manning, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee.
Before EDWARDS and CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judges and CECIL, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM.
[1] This is an appeal from an order of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of the United States but not adjudicating the liability of other defendants. Despite the clear language of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure54(b) and several equally clear holdings of this Court, appellant neither sought nor received a Rule 54(b) certification that the order in question was a final judgment. Therefore, there was no final decision in terms of28 U.S.C. § 1291and this Court is without jurisdiction to consider the appeal.Balsbaugh v. City ofWestland,458 F.2d 1358(6th Cir. 1972);Partin v. HassanMotors, Inc.,363 F.2d 104(6th Cir. 1966);Gabbard v. Rose,330 F.2d 705(6th Cir. 1964).

[2] Since, however, a Rule 54(b) certification appears to be appropriate in this case, if appellant is able to obtain such from the district court within thirty days of the date of filing of this opinion, the appeal will be reinstated by the clerk, after appropriate notice of appeal and other jurisdictional prerequisites, for prompt disposition by this panel without additional briefing or oral argument.

[3] Dismissed.Page 585