Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Walling v. Crown Overall Mfg. Co.

149 F.2d 152

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1945-05-07
Topic
finance

PER CURIAM. This case came on to be heard upon the record, briefs, and oral argument of counsel. And it appearing that the cause was referred to a special master, who after extensive hearings made comprehensive findings of fact which were approved by the District Court; and no clear mistake appearing; And it appearing that the District Court did not err in holding that new employees are entitled to be paid the minimum wage for each week of employment during which a substantial part of such employees’ activities relates to goods moving in interstate commerce, Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co., 317 U.S. 564, 572, 63 S.Ct. 332, 87 L.Ed. 460; Walling v. Mutual Wholesale Food & Supply Co., 8 Cir., 141 F.2d 331 ; And it appearing that the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division is not immune from liability for costs, Title 29 U.S.C., Sec. 217, Sec. 215, Sec. 204(b), 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 217, 215, 204(b); Reconstruction Finance Corporation v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Walling v. Crown Overall Mfg. Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
WALLING v. CROWN OVERALL MFG. CO.,149 F.2d 152(6th Cir. 1945)
WALLING, Adm'r, Wage and Hour Division, U.S. Dept. of Labor, v. CROWN
OVERALL MFG. CO. CROWN OVERALL MFG. CO. v. WALLING, Adm'r, Wage and Hour
Division, U.S. Dept. of Labor.
Nos. 9929, 9930.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
May 7, 1945.
Page 153
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio.

Action by L. Metcalfe Walling, Administrator, Wage and Hour Division, United States Department of Labor, against the Crown Overall Manufacturing Company. From the judgment, the Administrator appeals, and the Crown Overall Manufacturing Company cross-appeals.

Affirmed.
Douglas B. Maggs, of Washington, D.C., and Charles A. Reynard, of Cleveland, Ohio, for Walling, Adm'r.

Paxton Seasongood, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for Crown Overall Mfg. Co.
Before SIMONS, ALLEN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This case came on to be heard upon the record, briefs, and oral argument of counsel.

And it appearing that the cause was referred to a special master, who after extensive hearings made comprehensive findings of fact which were approved by the District Court; and no clear mistake appearing;

And it appearing that the District Court did not err in holding that new employees are entitled to be paid the minimum wage for each week of employment during which a substantial part of such employees' activities relates to goods moving in interstate commerce, Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.,317 U.S. 564,572,63 S.Ct. 332,87 L.Ed. 460; Walling v. Mutual Wholesale Food Supply Co., 8 Cir.,141 F.2d 331;

And it appearing that the Administrator of the Wage and Hour Division is not immune from liability for costs, Title29 U.S.C. § 217, Sec.215, Sec.204(b),29 U.S.C.A. §§ 217,215,204(b); Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. J.G. Menihan Corporation,312 U.S. 81,83,85,61 S.Ct. 485,85 L.Ed. 595; and no reversible error appearing in the record:

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be, and it hereby is, affirmed.Page 247