Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Vollink v. Holland Celery Planter Co.

112 F.2d 576

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1940-04-08
Topic
labor-and-employment

PER CURIAM. This cause was heard upon the transcript, briefs and arguments of counsel; and it appearing that the record presents no reversible error, it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the decree herein appealed from be, and the same is in all things affirmed upon the grounds and for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Court, 33 F.Supp. 203, filed February % 1938.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Vollink v. Holland Celery Planter Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
4 opinions
VOLLINK v. HOLLAND CELERY PLANTER CO.,112 F.2d 576(6th Cir. 1940)
Hattie VOLLINK, Appellant, v. HOLLAND CELERY PLANTER CO. et al.,
Appellees.
No. 8193.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
April 8, 1940.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Michigan; Fred M. Raymond, Judge.
Troff McKessy, of Kalamazoo, Mich., and Thomas G. Boman, of Grand Rapids, Mich., for appellant.

Diekema, Cross, TenCate, of Holland, Mich., and Rice Rice, of Grand Rapids, Mich., for appellees.
Before HICKS, ALLEN, and ARANT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This cause was heard upon the transcript, briefs and arguments of counsel; and it appearing that the record presents no reversible error, it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the decree herein appealed from be, and the same is in all things affirmed upon the grounds and for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Court,33 F. Supp. 203, filed February 9, 1938.Page 751