Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

United States v. Ruth B. Hopper

United States v. Ruth B. Hopper, 214 F.2d 129 (6th Cir. 1954)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1954-04-28
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. This appeal was heard on the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties ; And the Court being of the opinion that the judgments of the District Court included in this consolidated appeal are not erroneous, for the reasons given by the District Judge in his Memorandum Opinion of July 31, 1952, 122 F.Supp. 181, on appellant’s motion for summary judgment; It Is Ordered That said judgments be and are now affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Ruth B. Hopper. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
UNITED STATES v. HOPPER,214 F.2d 129(6th Cir. 1954)
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Ruth B. HOPPER et al., Appellees.
No. 11964.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
April 28, 1954.
Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Eastern District of Tennessee; Darr, Judge.
Warren E. Burger, Washington, D.C., John C. Crawford, Jr., Knoxville, Tenn., for appellant.

Spears, Reynolds, Moore Rebman, Chattanooga, Tenn., for appellees.
Before MILLER, Circuit Judge, and GOURLEY and STARR, District Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This appeal was heard on the record, briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties;

And the Court being of the opinion that the judgments of the District Court included in this consolidated appeal are not erroneous, for the reasons given by the District Judge in his Memorandum Opinion of July 31, 1952,122 F. Supp. 181, on appellant's motion for summary judgment;

It Is Ordered That said judgments be and are now affirmed.Page 130