Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

United States v. Black

164 F.2d 96

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1947-10-16
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. This case came on to be heard upon the briefs and record and oral argument of counsel; and it appearing that the controlling questions are questions of fact, and that the findings of fact of the District Court are supported by the evidence: it is ordered that the judgment, 68 F.Supp. 74, be, and it hereby is, affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Black. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
UNITED STATES v. BLACK,164 F.2d 96(6th Cir. 1947)
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Robert B. BLACK, Donald S. Black,
and Roger A. Black, Executors of the Estate of Frank B. BLACK, Deceased,
Appellees.
No. 10446.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
October 16, 1947.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio; Robert N. Wilkin, Judge.
Don C. Miller and Francis B. Kavanagh, both of Cleveland, Ohio, and Fredk. G. Rita, Franklin Korrell, and Sewall Key, all of Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Jones, Day, Cockley Reavis, of Cleveland, Ohio, and William McE. Weldon, of Mansfield, Ohio, for appellees.
Before ALLEN, McALLISTER, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This case came on to be heard upon the briefs and record and oral argument of counsel; and it appearing that the controlling questions are questions of fact, and that the findings of fact of the District Court are supported by the evidence: it is ordered that the judgment,68 F. Supp. 74, be, and it hereby is, affirmed.Page 208