Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Stephens v. United States

85 F.2d 570

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1936-03-04
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. It appearing that this suit was brought by the administrator of the estate of Thomas E. Stephens, who served in the United States Army from December 18, 1914, to July 25, 1917, to recover automatic insurance for the benefit of his brothers and sisters under section 401 of the amended War Risk Insurance Act passed October 6, 1917 (40 Stat. 409), as again amended by section 19 of the Act of June 25, 1918 (40 Stat. 609, 614-, 615), but that the statute does not provide for the payment of such automatic insurance benefits to brothers and sisters of a deceased soldier, and it further appearing that such benefits were in the nature of gratuities and that the statute allowing them was repealed by section 17 of title 1 of the Act of March 20, 1933, commonly called the Economy Act, ch. 3, 48 Stat. 11 (U.S.C. tit. 38, §717 [38 U.S.C.A. §717]), It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the order of the District Court sustaining the demurrer to appellant’s petition be, and the same is, affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Stephens v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
3 opinions
STEPHENS v. UNITED STATES,85 F.2d 570(6th Cir. 1936)
STEPHENS v. UNITED STATES.
No. 7229.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
March 4, 1936.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Kentucky; H. Church Ford, Judge.

Action by Albert Stephens, administrator of the estate of Thomas E. Stephens, deceased, against the United States. From an adverse judgment, the plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.
J.B. Johnson, of Williamsburg, Ky., for appellant.

Mac Swinford, U.S. Atty., of Lexington, Ky.
Before HICKS, SIMONS, and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
It appearing that this suit was brought by the administrator of the estate of Thomas E. Stephens, who served in the United States Army from December 18, 1914, to July 25, 1917, to recover automatic insurance for the benefit of his brothers and sisters under section 401 of the amended War Risk Insurance Act passed October 6, 1917 (40 Stat. 409), as again amended by section 19 of the Act of June 25, 1918 (40 Stat. 609, 614, 615), but that the statute does not provide for the payment of such automatic insurance benefits to brothers and sisters of a deceased soldier, and it further appearing that such benefits were in the nature of gratuities and that the statute allowing them was repealed by section 17 of title 1 of the Act of March 20, 1933, commonly called the Economy Act, ch. 3,48 Stat. 11(U.S.C. tit. 38, § 717 [38 U.S.C.A. § 717]),

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the order of the District Court sustaining the demurrer to appellant's petition be, and the same is, affirmed.Page 612