Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Schreiber v. Commissioner

Schreiber v. Comm’r, 160 F.2d 108 (6th Cir. 1947)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1947-02-12
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. This cause was heard and submitted upon transcript of record, oral arguments and printed briefs of attorneys for the contending parties; And it appearing that the findings of fact of the Tax Court of the United States are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous, and that the conclusions of law reached in the opinion of that tribunal conform to the principles announced in Commissioner v. Tower, 327 U.S. 280, 66 S.Ct. 532, and Lusthaus v. Commissioner, 327 U.S. 293, 66 S.Ct. 539, and are rationalized upon sound reasoning [See Dobson v. Commissioner, 320 U.S. 489, 64 S.Ct. 239, 88 L.Ed. 248]; The decision of the Tax Court, 6 T.C. 707, in the case of Abe Schreiber v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Schreiber v. Commissioner. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 3 opinions

SCHREIBER v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,160 F.2d 108(6th Cir. 1947)

Abe SCHREIBER, et al., Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent. J.R. SHAPROW v. SAME.

No. 10361.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

February 12, 1947.

Appeal from decision of the Tax Court of the United States.

John F. Langs, of Detroit, Mich., for petitioner.

Douglas W. McGregor, J.P. Wenchel, Sewall Key, Robert N. Anderson and Harry Baum, all of Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before HICKS, ALLEN and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard and submitted upon transcript of record, oral arguments and printed briefs of attorneys for the contending parties;

And it appearing that the findings of fact of the Tax Court of the United States are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous, and that the conclusions of law reached in the opinion of that tribunal conform to the principles announced in Commissioner v. Tower,327 U.S. 280,66 S.Ct. 532, and Lusthaus v. Commissioner,327 U.S. 293,66 S.Ct. 539, and are rationalized upon sound reasoning [See Dobson v. Commissioner,320 U.S. 489,64 S.Ct. 239,88 L.Ed. 248];

The decision of the Tax Court,6 T.C. 707, in the case of Abe Schreiber v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue is affirmed; likewise, the decision of the Tax Court in the case of J.C. Shaprow v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue is affirmed.Page 304