Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

National Labor Relations Board v. Electric Auto-Lite Company

Nat’l Labor Rels. Bd. v. Elec. Auto-Lite Co., 196 F.2d 500 (6th Cir. 1952)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1952-04-17
Topic
general

196 F.2d 500 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. ELECTRIC AUTO-LITE COMPANY and Local 12, International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, CIO, Respondents. No. 11427. United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. April 17, 1952.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed National Labor Relations Board v. Electric Auto-Lite Company. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
2 opinions

196 F.2d 500

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
ELECTRIC AUTO-LITE COMPANY and Local 12, International
Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and
Agricultural Implement Workers of
America, CIO, Respondents.

No. 11427.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

April 17, 1952.

George J. Bott, Washington, D.C., John A. Hull, Jr., Cleveland, Ohio, and Maurice Alexandre, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

James P. Falvey, Lowell Goerlich and Louis S. Lebo, all of Toledo, Ohio, for respondent.

Before ALLEN, McALLISTER, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and it appearing that the findings of the Board are supported by substantial evidence on the record, considered as a whole, and the court being duly advised,

2

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order be and the same is hereby granted for the reasons set forth in its decision and order.