Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Larry Booker v. John Jabe, Warden, Kinross Correctional Facility
801 F.2d 871
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1986-09-26
- Topic
- litigation
PER CURIAM. This appeal is before us on remand from the Supreme Court “for further consideration in light of Allen v. Hardy, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 2878, 92 L.Ed.2d 199 (1986) and Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986).” Michigan v. Booker, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 3289, 92 L.Ed.2d 705 (1986).
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Larry Booker v. John Jabe, Warden, Kinross Correctional Facility. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 30 opinions
BOOKER v. JABE,801 F.2d 871(6th Cir. 1986)
LARRY BOOKER, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. JOHN JABE, WARDEN, KINROSS
CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE.
No. 83-1136.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Argued September 20, 1984.
Decided September 26, 1986.
Chari Grove argued, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner-appellant.Page 872
Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen. of Mich., Eric J. Eggan, Edgar L. Church, Jr. argued, Asst. Atty. Gen., Corrections Div., Lansing, Mich., for respondent-appellee.
Before MERRITT and JONES, Circuit Judges; and BELL, District Judge.fn*
[2] We therefore reinstate our previous opinion and judgment.
- The Honorable Samuel H. Bell, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. ↩