Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Jesse Pierce v. United States

224 F.2d 281

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1955-06-15
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge McNamee denying a new trial, 124 F.Supp. 264, and upon the authority of Goldman v. United States, 316 U.S. 129, 62 S.Ct. 993, 86 L.Ed. 1322; Flanders v. United States, 6 Cir., 222 F.2d 163; and Browner v. United States, 6 Cir., 215 F.2d 753.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Jesse Pierce v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
5 opinions
PIERCE v. UNITED STATES,224 F.2d 281(6th Cir. 1955)
Jesse PIERCE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 12415.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
June 15, 1955.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio; McNamee, Judge.
Marc J. Wolpaw, and Irwin B. Fried, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellant.

Sumner Canary and Eben H. Cockley, U.S. Atty., Cleveland, Ohio, for appellee.
Before ALLEN, MARTIN, and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of Judge McNamee denying a new trial,124 F. Supp. 264, and upon the authority of Goldman v. United States,316 U.S. 129,62 S.Ct. 993,86 L. Ed. 1322; Flanders v. United States, 6 Cir.,222 F.2d 163; and Browner v. United States, 6 Cir.,215 F.2d 753.Page 283