Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Conlon v. Michigan Brewing Co.

101 F.2d 1007

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1939-01-11
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. It does not appear that there was an abuse of judicial discretion in denying the modification of the injunction entered on March 16, 1938, so as to permit appellant to proceed against appellee, Michigan Brewing Company, debtor, in the case pending in the Circuit Court for the County of Kent, Michigan, entitled “Walter J. Conlon vs. Michigan Brewing Company, et al, No. 36946”. It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the order, 24 F.Supp. 430, appealed from be, and the same is, affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Conlon v. Michigan Brewing Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
5 opinions
CONLON v. MICHIGAN BREWING COMPANY,101 F.2d 1007(6th Cir. 1939)
Walter J. CONLON, Appellant, v. MICHIGAN BREWING COMPANY, a Michigan
Corporation, Debtor, Appellee.
No. 8070.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
January 11, 1939.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Michigan; Fred M. Raymond, Judge.Page 1008
Linsey, Shivel, Phelps Vander Wal, of Grand Rapids, Mich., for appellant.

Roger I. Wykes and Warner, Norcross Judd, all of Grand Rapids, Mich., for appellee.
Before HICKS, ALLEN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
It does not appear that there was an abuse of judicial discretion in denying the modification of the injunction entered on March 16, 1938, so as to permit appellant to proceed against appellee, Michigan Brewing Company, debtor, in the case pending in the Circuit Court for the County of Kent, Michigan, entitled "Walter J. Conlon vs. Michigan Brewing Company, et al, No. 36946".

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the order,24 F. Supp. 430, appealed from be, and the same is, affirmed.