Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Carter v. Kubler

131 F.2d 222

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1942-10-14
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and it appearing that there was no abuse of judicial discretion in the finding that the reasonable market value of the farm land in question was $20,000, and no reversible error appearing, it is ordered and adjudged that the judgments and orders appealed from be and the same are in all things affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Carter v. Kubler. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

MATTER OF CARTER,131 F.2d 222(6th Cir. 1942)

In the Matter of Thad Benson CARTER, Farm Debtor. Thad Benson CARTER,

Appellant, v. George A. KUBLER, Appellee.

No. 9165.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

October 14, 1942.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio; Paul Jones, Judge.Page 223

Elmer McClain and Leon N. Stone, both of Lima, Ohio, for appellant.

T.W. Kimber, of Akron, Ohio, for appellee.

Before HICKS, SIMONS, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel, and it appearing that there was no abuse of judicial discretion in the finding that the reasonable market value of the farm land in question was $20,000, and no reversible error appearing, it is ordered and adjudged that the judgments and orders appealed from be and the same are in all things affirmed.