Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Bromine Division, Drug Research, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Bromine Div., Drug Rsch., Inc. v. Nat’l Labor Rels. Bd., 580 F.2d 239 (6th Cir. 1978)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1978-08-11
Topic
general

*240ORDER These appeals are before the Court on petition for review by the employer, Bromine Division, Drug Research, Inc., and intervening petition for review by the union, UAW, and on application of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order issued against the employer on June 18, 1976, and reported at 224 NLRB No. 177. The pertinent facts are contained in the decision and order of the Board. After considering the briefs and oral argument, the Court concludes that the decision of the Board is supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the order of the Board be and hereby is enforced.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bromine Division, Drug Research, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion

580 F.2d 239

99 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2697, 84 Lab.Cas. P 10,885

BROMINE DIVISION, DRUG RESEARCH, INC., Petitioner,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.
INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE AEROSPACE AND
AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA (UAW), Petitioner,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

Nos. 76-1937, 76-2189.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

Aug. 11, 1978.

Dee Edwards, Detroit, Mich., for Bromine Div., Drug Research, Inc.

Charles Looman Jr., Marston, Sachs, Nunn, Kates, Kadushin & O'Hare, P. C., Flint, Mich., for intervenor.

Charles Looman, Jr., Marston, Sachs, Nunn, Kates, Kadushin & O'Hare, P. C., Flint, Mich., for Intern. Union, etc.

Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Michael F. Messitte, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., for N.L.R.B.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and PECK and MERRITT, Circuit Judges.ORDER

1

These appeals are before the Court on petition for review by the employer, Bromine Division, Drug Research, Inc., and intervening petition for review by the union, UAW, and on application of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order issued against the employer on June 18, 1976, and reported at 224 NLRB No. 177. The pertinent facts are contained in the decision and order of the Board.

2

After considering the briefs and oral argument, the Court concludes that the decision of the Board is supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole.

3

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the order of the Board be and hereby is enforced.