Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Batterman v. Commissioner

142 F.2d 448

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1944-02-25
Topic
general

PER CURIAM. This cause came on to be heard upon the record and the briefs and oral arguments of the attorneys for the parties, upon due consideration of which it is manifest' that upon the findings of fact and opinion of the Tax Court of the United States its decision is correct; and is, therefore, affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Batterman v. Commissioner. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
7 opinions
BATTERMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,142 F.2d 448(6th Cir. 1944)
John J. BATTERMAN, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent.
No. 9609.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
February 25, 1944.
On Petition to Review Decision of the Tax Court of the United States.
Sydney A. Davies and Davies Eshner, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner.

Samuel O. Clark, Jr., J.P. Wenchel, Sewall Key, C.E. Lowery, A.F. Prescott, and Melva M. Graney, all of Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Before SIMONS, HAMILTON, and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard upon the record and the briefs and oral arguments of the attorneys for the parties, upon due consideration of which it is manifest that upon the findings of fact and opinion of the Tax Court of the United States its decision is correct; and is, therefore, affirmed.Page 449