Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Williams v. Califano

566 F.2d 1044

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1978-01-26
Topic
litigation

PER CURIAM: We affirm the judgment of the District Court for the reasons stated in its memorandum opinion which is reported at 441 F.Supp. 1045 (E.D.La.1977). AFFIRMED.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Williams v. Califano. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
8 opinions
WILLIAMS v. CALIFANO,566 F.2d 1044(5th Cir. 1978)
ANGELA M. WILLIAMS ET AL., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, JOSEPH A. CALIFANO, JR.,
SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.
No. 77-1618.
Summary Calendar.fn*
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
January 26, 1978.
James W. Blackman, Trial Atty., N. O. Legal Assistance Corp., Jack M. Stolier, Lois C. Davis, New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellant.

Gerald J. Gallinghouse, U.S. Atty., New Orleans, La., William Kanter, Alice L. Mattice, Attys., Barbara Allen Babcock, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Justice, Civ. Div., App. Sect., Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Alvin B. Rubin, Judge.
Before THORNBERRY, RONEY, and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
[1] We affirm the judgment of the District Court for the reasons stated in its memorandum opinion which is reported at441 F. Supp. 1045(E.D.La. 1977).

[2] AFFIRMED.Page 1213
  1. Rule 18, 5 Cir.; seeIsbell Enterprises, Inc. v. CitizensCasualty Co. of New York et al.,5 Cir., 1970,431 F.2d 409. ↩