Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

United States v. Warren

United States v. Warren, 589 F.2d 254 (5th Cir. 1979)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1979-01-24
Topic
estate-planning

BY THE COURT: By its order of December 20, 1978, 586 F.2d 608 the Court en banc reserved disposition of the petition for rehearing by appellants Thomas A. Warren, and John L. Warren, Jr. for violation of 31 U.S.C.A. §§ 1058, 1101, on the concurrent sentence issue, IT IS ORDERED that the cause with respect thereto shall be considered by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument. The Clerk shall set a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Warren. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
3 opinions
UNITED STATES v. WARREN,589 F.2d 254(5th Cir. 1979)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. JOHN L. WARREN, JR. AND
THOMAS A. WARREN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
No. 75-4368.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
January 24, 1979.
Michael S. Tarre, Miami, Fla., for defendants-appellants Warren.

Daniel S. Pearson, Miami, Fla. (Court-appointed), for John L. Warren, Jr.

Sky E. Smith, Miami, Fla. (Court-appointed), for David DeFina.

Alan M. Medof, Miami, Fla. (Court-appointed), for Des. E. Schick.

Stewart E. Parsons, Florida State Hospital, Chattahoochee, Fla. (Court-appointed), for Thomas Warren.

Jack V. Eskenazi, U.S. Atty., Jamie L. Whitten, Asst. U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., Shirley Baccus-Lobel, Asst. U.S. Atty., Dallas, Tex. (on rehearing), Louis M. Fischer, Atty., Appellate Section, Crim. Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, MEHRTENS, Judge.
[1] ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING AND PETITIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC
[2] (Opinion August 24, 1978, 5 Cir. 1978,578 F.2d 1058).
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN and VANCE, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
[3] By its order of December 20, 1978,586 F.2d 608the Court en banc reserved disposition of the petition for rehearing by appellants Thomas A. Warren, and John L. Warren, Jr. for violation of 31 U.S.C.A. §§ 1058,1101, on the concurrent sentence issue,

[4] IT IS ORDERED that the cause with respect thereto shall be considered by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument. The Clerk shall set a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.Page 786