Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
United States v. Robert Henry Golding
739 F.2d 183
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1984-08-01
- Topic
- bankruptcy
stating that in criminal cases this court treats a late notice of appeal filed within the additional 30-day period as a motion for a determination as to whether excusable neglect entitles a defendant to an extension of time | “We are compelled to raise sua sponte the issue of timeliness for a timely notice of appeal is essential to our jurisdiction on appeal.” | “We are compelled to FED. R. APP. P. 4(b)(1)(A). raise sua sponte the issue of timeliness for a timely notice of appeal is essential to our jurisdiction on 2 Rule 4(b)(4) states: appeal.”
Citator
- Cited by
- 31 opinions
UNITED STATES v. GOLDING,739 F.2d 183(5th Cir. 1984)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ROBERT HENRY GOLDING,
DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
No. 84-1608.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
August 1, 1984.
Page 184
Helen M. Eversberg, U.S. Atty., Sidney Powell, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before RUBIN, TATE, GARWOOD, Circuit Judges.
[2] We are compelled to raisesua spontethe issue of timeliness for a timely notice of appeal is essential to our jurisdiction on appeal.Nelson v. Foti,707 F.2d 170(5th Cir. 1983). The ten day period prescribed by Rule 4(b) for noticing an appeal in a criminal case may be extended by the district court upon a finding of excusable neglect.See United States v. Scott,672 F.2d 454(5th Cir. 1982). We presume neither the presence nor absence of excusable neglect but defer to the district court for this determination.
[3] Remanded for a determination whether the Notice of Appeal should be deemed timely under Fed.R.App.P.4(b).
[4] REMANDED.