Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

United States v. Richard Glynn Byrd

United States v. Richard Glynn Byrd, 494 F.2d 1284 (5th Cir. 1974)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1974-05-28
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: We grant appellee’s petition for rehearing. In United States v. Miller, 492 F.2d 37 (5th Cir., 1974), the court held that Almeida-Sanchez v. United States, 1973, 413 U.S. 266, 93 S.Ct. 2535, 37 L.Ed.2d 596, should be given only prospective application. We therefore abandon any reliance upon Almeida-Sanchez.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Richard Glynn Byrd. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
14 opinions
UNITED STATES v. BYRD,494 F.2d 1284(5th Cir. 1974)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. RICHARD GLYNN BYRD,
DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
No. 73-1426.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
May 28, 1974.
Warren Heagy, Odessa, Tex., for defendant-appellant.
Anthony J. P. Farris, U.S. Atty., Robert G. Darden, Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Ben C. Connally, Chief Judge.
[1] ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
[2] Opinion Sept. 7, 1973, 5 Cir., 1973,483 F.2d 1196.
Before BELL, GODBOLD and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
[3] We grant appellee's petition for rehearing. In United States v. Miller,492 F.2d 37(5th Cir., 1974), the court held that Almeida-Sanchez v. United States, 1973,413 U.S. 266,93 S.Ct. 2535,37 L.Ed.2d 596, should be given only prospective application. We therefore abandon any reliance uponAlmeida-Sanchez.We do, however, sustain our prior reversal1upon the authority of United States v. Storm,480 F.2d 701(5th Cir., 1973), and Marsh v. United States,344 F.2d 317(5th Cir., 1965), as discussed therein.See alsoUnited States v. Bursey,491 F.2d 531(5th Cir., 1974).Page 1352
  1. United States v. Byrd,483 F.2d 1196(1973). ↩