Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
United States v. Holt
United States v. Holt, 650 F.2d 651 (5th Cir. 1981)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1981-07-13
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- conviction of defendant Holt mooted by his death
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Holt. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 18 opinions
UNITED STATES v. HOLT,650 F.2d 651(5th Cir. 1981)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. JOHN ALAN HOLT, ROSARIO
PALERMO, WILLIAM H. BROWN, A/K/A BILL, JOHN D. FISHER, ROBERT D. YOUNG,
JOSEPH MACALUSO, A/K/A JOE, FRANK SCIONTI, JOHN NICHOLAS LOSTRACCO, SAM C.
MARTINO, PAUL GUARINO, JIMMY FARINA, BERTON B. CHASE, A/K/A BERT, ROLANDO
GONSALEZ RODRIGUEZ, A/K/A ROLAND RODRIGUEZ, JOSEPH D. LAZZARA, A/K/A JOE,
JOSEPH C. RUSSELLO, A/K/A JOE, AND AMALIA MORGADO, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
No. 78-5260.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
July 13, 1981.
William B. Plowman, Tampa, Fla., for Farina.
Mark J. Kadish, Edward T. M. Garland, Atlanta, Ga. (Court-appointed), for Brown.
Peter N. Macaluso, Tampa, Fla., for Rodriguez.
Barry A. Cohen, Richard G. Pippinger, Tampa, Fla., for Lazzara.
Raymond E. LaPorte, Tampa, Fla., for Rusello.Page 652
Michael Addison, Tampa, Fla. (Court-appointed), for Morgado.
Before TUTTLE, VANCE and POLITZ, Circuit Judges.