Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

United States v. Henry

United States v. Henry, 693 F.2d 31 (5th Cir. 1982)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1982-11-18
Topic
estate-planning

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Opinion July 14, 1982, 5 Cir., 1982, 680 F.2d 403). Before CLARK, Chief Judge, BROWN, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY and HIGGINBOT-HAM, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the *32judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the causes shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Henry. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
3 opinions
UNITED STATES v. HENRY,693 F.2d 31(5th Cir. 1982)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. RICHARD BULLOCK HENRY,
A/K/A IMARI ABUBAKARI OBADELE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. WAYNE JAMES, A/K/A OFFOGA
QUADDUS, AND THOMAS NORMAN, A/K/A HEKIMA ANA, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Nos. 81-4107, 81-4254.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
November 18, 1982.
Fred L. Banks, Jr., Jackson, Miss. (Court Appointed), for Henry.

Barbara Y. Phillips, San Francisco, Cal., for James and Norman.

James B. Tucker, Asst. U.S. Atty., Jackson, Miss., Patty Merkamp Stemler, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi.
[1]ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
[2] (Opinion July 14, 1982, 5 Cir., 1982,680 F.2d 403).
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, BROWN, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, TATE, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.
BY THE COURT:
[3] A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of thePage 32judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

[4] IT IS ORDERED that the causes shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.