Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

United States v. Blount

United States v. Blount, 104 F.3d 58 (5th Cir. 1997)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1997-01-09
Topic
general

BY THE COURT: A majority of judges in active service having determined, on the Court’s own motion, to rehear this case en bane, IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed United States v. Blount. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
3 opinions

104 F.3d 58

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Donnie Lamont BLOUNT and Gaylin Terod Johnson, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 95-20359.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 9, 1997.

Alice Ann Burns, Asst. U.S. Atty., U.S. Attorney's Office, Paula Camille Offenhauser, Houston, TX, for plaintiff-appellee.

Robert E. Dolan, Houston, TX, for Gaylin Terod Johnson, defendant-appellant.

George McCall Secrest, Jr., Bennett, Secrest & Meyers, Houston, TX, for Donnie Lamont Blount, defendant-appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Melinda Harmon, Judge.

(Opinion October 22, 1996, 5 Cir., 1996, 98 F.3d 1489).

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1

A majority of judges in active service having determined, on the Court's own motion, to rehear this case en banc,

2

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.