Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Thomas Harrison, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Housing Authority of the City of College Park

592 F.2d 281

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1979-04-30
Topic
litigation

How later courts describe this case

  • HUD handbooks are merely advisory

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Thomas Harrison, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Housing Authority of the City of College Park. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
3 opinions
HARRISON v. HOUSING AUTH OF CITY, COLLEGE PARK,592 F.2d 281(5th Cir. 1979)
THOMAS HARRISON, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY
SITUATED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF COLLEGE
PARK ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.
No. 78-2144.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 30, 1979.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied April 30, 1979.
Claudia Tesoro, Myron Kramer, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.

Nancy Merrill Hunt, College Park, Ga., Virginia A. Bonner, Decatur, Ga., for defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia; Harold L. Murphy, Judge.
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, AINSWORTH, Circuit Judge, and CAMPBELLfn*, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
[1] We affirm on the basis of the District Court's opinion,445 F. Supp. 356, holding that Thomas Harrison did not, under Georgia law, have a property interest in his continued employment with the City of College Park Housing Authority.See Bishop v. Wood,1976,426 U.S. 341,96 S.Ct. 2074,48 L.Ed.2d 684.

[2] AFFIRMED.
  1. District Judge of the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation. ↩