Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Texports Stevedore Co. v. Winchester
Texports Stevedore Co. v. Winchester, 569 F.2d 428 (5th Cir. 1978)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1978-02-23
- Topic
- general
BY THE COURT: A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Texports Stevedore Co. v. Winchester. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 1 opinion
TEXPORTS STEVEDORE COMPANY v. WINCHESTER,569 F.2d 428(5th Cir. 1978)
TEXPORTS STEVEDORE COMPANY, and Texas Employers' Insurance Association,
Petitioners, v. Murl J. WINCHESTER and Director, Office of Workers'
Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor, Respondents.
No. 76-4100.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
February 23, 1978.
Alfred G. Albert, Acting Sol., Laurie M. Streeter, Associate Sol. of Labor, Ronald E. Meisburg, Atty., U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., for Director, Office of Workers' Com. Programs.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion June 20, 1977, 5 Cir., 1977,554 F.2d 245).
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, RUBIN, and VANCE, Circuit Judges.
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.Page 823