Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

T. Smith & Son, Inc. v. Willie Wilson, and P. J. Donovan, Deputy Commissioner

T. Smith & Son, Inc. v. Willie Wilson, & P. J. Donovan, Deputy Comm’r, 328 F.2d 313 (5th Cir. 1964)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1964-04-03
Topic
general

*314 PER CURIAM. This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment for plaintiff for the reasons for judgment set out in the district judge’s opinion. 1 Of the clear opinion that the district judge’s order should be affirmed, for the reasons that he gave, we approve his opinion and affirm his judgment. 2 Affirmed. 1 . Wilson v. Donovan, Deputy Commissioner, etc., D.C., 218 F.Supp. 944. 2 . See 15 Am.Jur. 387, See. 2; Restatement of the Law of Contracts, p. 498, Sec. 326; Aetna Cas. & Ins.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed T. Smith & Son, Inc. v. Willie Wilson, and P. J. Donovan, Deputy Commissioner. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
2 opinions
T. SMITH SON, INC. v. WILSON,328 F.2d 313(5th Cir. 1964)
T. SMITH SON, INC., Appellant, v. Willie WILSON, and P.J. Donovan,
Deputy Commissioner, Appellees.
No. 20837.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 3, 1964.
Rehearing Denied April 3, 1964.
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, Robert A. Ainsworth, Jr., Judge.
Virgil M. Wheeler, Jr., of Sehrt, Boyle Wheeler, Edward J. Boyle, Jr., Peter J. Butler and Anita D. Keegan, New Orleans, La., for appellant.

Gene S. Palmisano, Asst. U.S. Atty., Max Zelden, New Orleans, La., David L. Rose, Morton Hollander, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Zelden Zelden, New Orleans, La., for appellee.
Before HUTCHESON and BELL, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge.Page 314
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment for plaintiff for the reasons for judgment set out in the district judge's opinion.1

Of the clear opinion that the district judge's order should be affirmed, for the reasons that he gave, we approve his opinion and affirm his judgment.2

Affirmed.
  1. Wilson v. Donovan, Deputy Commissioner, etc., D.C.,218 F. Supp. 944. ↩
  2. See 15 Am.Jur. 387, Sec. 2; Restatement of the Law of Contracts, p. 498, Sec. 326; Aetna Cas. Ins. Co. v. Jordan,234 Ark. 339,352 S.W.2d 75; Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co. v. De Bruin,271 Wis. 412,73 N.W.2d 479; Hagenah v. Lumbermen's Mut. Cas. Co.,241 Wis. 226,5 N.W.2d 760, 142 A.L.R. 1417; Texas Pac. Ry. Co. et al. v. City of Marshall,136 U.S. 393,10 S.Ct. 846,34 L.Ed. 385; Miller v. Weller, 3 Cir.,288 F.2d 438; Scott v. Donald,165 U.S. 58,17 S.Ct. 265,41 L.Ed. 632; Paterson v. Sears-Roebuck Co.,196 F.2d 947. ↩