Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Sullivan v. United States

Sullivan v. United States, 411 F.2d 794 (5th Cir. 1969)

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1969-05-27
Topic: general

How later courts describe this case

preparation and circulation of flight chart an “operational task” rather than negligent misrepresentation

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Sullivan v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 12 opinions

SULLIVAN v. UNITED STATES,411 F.2d 794(5th Cir. 1969)

James M. SULLIVAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES of America,

Defendant-Appellant, v. Kenneth F. RUMSEY, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.

No. 26885.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 27, 1969.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alabama at Tuscaloosa; Harlan Hobart Grooms, Judge.

Macon L. Weaver, U.S. Atty., Birmingham, Ala., John G. Laughlin, Chief Torts Section, Wm. L. Morrow, Atty., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Alan S. Rosenthal, Robert V. Zener, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., William D. Ruckelshaus and Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellant.

Frank W. Riggs, III, Truman M. Hobbs, Montgomery, Ala., Hubbard H. Harvey, Demopolis, Ala., Richard H. Gill, Montgomery, Ala., Hobbs, Cope-land, Franco, Riggs Screws, Montgomery, Ala., of counsel, for appellee.

Before TUTTLE and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, and COMISKEY, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment in this case is affirmed on the basis of the reasoning set forth in Part I of the opinion of the District Court.299 F. Supp. 621(N.D.Ala. 1969).

Judgment affirmed.Page 818