Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Sexton v. Gibbs

446 F.2d 904

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1971-06-01
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • § 1983—suits for illegal arrest

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Sexton v. Gibbs. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
12 opinions
SEXTON v. GIBBS,446 F.2d 904(5th Cir. 1971)
Bruce SEXTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bruce GIBBS and Terry Stephens,
Defendants-Appellants.
No. 30127.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 1, 1971.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Halbert O. Woodward, Judge.
J. Bruce Aycock, City Atty., Amarillo, Tex., for defendants-appellants.

Harris E. Lofthus, Amarillo, Tex., for Plaintiff-appellee.
Before CLARK, Associate Justice,fn*and GEWIN and RONEY, Circuit Judges.Page 905
PER CURIAM:
This is a civil rights action under42 U.S.C. § 1983in which the appellee claims damages for an alleged unlawful arrest and an alleged unlawful search and seizure. After a hearing at which the facts were fully developed, the district court rendered judgment for the appellee. Our review of the record convinces us that the facts found by the district court are supported by substantial evidence and that the legal conclusions reached are supported by the facts as found. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court, Sexton v. Gibbs and Stephens,320 F. Supp. 134(N.D.Tex. 1970), is affirmed.
  1. Associate Justice, United States Supreme Court (Ret.), sitting by designation. ↩