Roger Mayweather v. Charles C. Foti, Jr.

holding that an occasional missed dose of medication does not, without more, constitute deliberate indifference | concluding that occasionally missed doses of medicine “fall far short” of establishing deliberate indifference | “Continuing back pain is unpleasant. Its existence does not, however, in and of itself demonstrate that a constitutional violation occurred.” | “Continuing back pain is unpleasant. Its existence does not, however, it and of itself demonstrate that a constitutional violation occurred | finding that an inmate received adequate care, even though the treatment may not have been the best, and that any deficiencies in treatment were minimal; moreover, the plaintiff’s continuing pain, in and of itself, did not demonstrate that a constitutional violation occurred | finding an occasional missed dose of medication does not, without more, constitute deliberate indifference | “claim for inadequate medical care would succeed only if [plaintiff] proved that the denial of care constituted ‘deliberate indifference to serious medical needs’” | the fact that a prisoner’s medical treatment “may not have been the best money could buy” is insufficient to establish a constitutional violation | occasional missed doses of medication, without more, “fall[s] far short of establishing deliberate indifference” by prison staff | prisoners are not entitled to "the best [treatment] that money c[an] buy" | occasionally missed doses of medicine “fall far short” of establishing deliberate indifference