Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Preston v. Leto

Preston v. Leto, 185 F.2d 1022 (5th Cir. 1951)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1951-01-23
Topic
litigation

PER CURIAM. On the authority of Garlin v. Currie, 5 Cir., 1950, 185 F.2d 401, the judgment is reversed and remanded for further and not inconsistent proceedings.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Preston v. Leto. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
W. PRESTON v. LETO,185 F.2d 1022(5th Cir. 1951)
Joe W. PRESTON, Appellant v. Bennie LETO, Appellee.
No. 13308.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
January 23, 1951.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; J. Skelly Wright, Judge.
David H. MacHauer, New Orleans, La., for appellant.

Weldon A. Cousins, Jos. A. Fiasconaro, Jr., both of New Orleans, La., for appellee.
Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
On the authority of Garlin v. Currie, 5 Cir., 1950,185 F.2d 401, the judgment is reversed and remanded for further and not inconsistent proceedings.
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
I dissent for the reasons stated by the court in Fields v. Washington, 3 Cir.,173 F.2d 701, and by Judge Minton in his dissenting opinion in Adler v. Northern Hotel Company, 7 Cir.,175 F.2d 619,622.Page 1022