Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Paul v. Parsons, Brinkerhoff, Quade & Douglas, Inc.

Paul v. Parsons, Brinkerhoff, Quade & Douglas, Inc., 53 F.3d 1282 (5th Cir. 1995)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1995-04-28
Topic
litigation

How later courts describe this case

  • “Paul’s assertion that he could not have asserted his FCA claims in the state court action is erroneous; state courts have concurrent jurisdiction over FCA claims.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Paul v. Parsons, Brinkerhoff, Quade & Douglas, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
2 opinions

53 F.3d 1282

Paul
v.
Parsons, Brinkerhoff, Quade & Douglas, Inc.*

NO. 94-20640
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Apr 28, 1995

1

Appeal From: S.D.Tex., No. CA-H-92-2429, 860 F.Supp. 370

2

AFFIRMED.

*

Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2