Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.
Patricia Thomas v. Cap. Sec. Servs., Inc., 822 F.2d 511 (5th Cir. 1987)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1987-07-09
- Topic
- bankruptcy
BY THE COURT: A majority of the Judges in active service, on the' Court’s own motion, having determined to have this case reheard en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. *512 The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 3 opinions
THOMAS v. CAPITAL SEC. SERVICES, INC.,822 F.2d 511(5th Cir. 1987)
PATRICIA THOMAS, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. CAPITAL SECURITY SERVICES,
INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
No. 86-4480.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
July 9, 1987.
Deborah A. McDonald, Mary Brown, Natchez, Miss., Willie L. Rose, McComb, Miss., George Cochran, University, Miss., for plaintiffs-appellees.
(Opinion March 20, 1987, 5 Cir., 1987,812 F.2d 984)
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, HILL, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
[2] IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed.Page 512The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.