Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Palmer v. Sanford

147 F.2d 549

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1945-03-08
Topic: general

PER CURIAM. The opinion of the district judge, 57 F. Supp. 104, carefully sets out the facts and correctly states the applicable law. The order discharging the writ and remanding the prisoner is affirmed for the reasons given in his opinion.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Palmer v. Sanford. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

PALMER v. SANFORD,147 F.2d 549(5th Cir. 1945)

Richard Alfred PALMER, Appellant, v. Joseph W. SANFORD, Warden, United

States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Ga., Appellee.

No. 11230.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 8, 1945.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Georgia; Robert L. Russell, Judge.

In Forma Pauperis.

Richard Alfred Palmer, in pro. per., for appellant.

M. Neil Andrews, U.S. Atty., and Harvey H. Tisinger, Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, HOLMES, and McCORD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The opinion of the district judge,57 F. Supp. 104, carefully sets out the facts and correctly states the applicable law. The order discharging the writ and remanding the prisoner is affirmed for the reasons given in his opinion.Page 583