Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Mississippi Chemical Corporation, a Mississippi Corporation, and Vulcan-Cincinnati, Inc., an Ohio Corporation v. The Hoechst-Uhde Corporation

338 F.2d 662

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1964-11-30
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: Invoking jurisdiction on the ground of diversity of citizenship, the appellant Mississippi Chemical Corporation brought an action in the District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi against the appellant Vulcan-Cincinnati, Incorporated, and Hoechst-Uhde Corporation. Jurisdiction over Hoechst-Uhde was attempted by constructive service, delivery of a summons having been made under a state statute upon the Secretary of State of the State of Mississippi. Vulcan-Cincinnati filed a cross-claim against Hoechst-Uhde. The district court relied heavily on Mississippi Wood Preserving Co. v. Rothschild, 5th Cir. 1953, 201 F.2d 233, and decided that the activities of Hoechst-Uhde were not such as brought it within the Mississippi statute permitting the constructive service of process on any non-resident corporation not qualified to do business in Mississippi but “who shall do any business or perform any character of work or service in this state * * *.” Code Miss.1942, §§ 1437-1438.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Mississippi Chemical Corporation, a Mississippi Corporation, and Vulcan-Cincinnati, Inc., an Ohio Corporation v. The Hoechst-Uhde Corporation. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
7 opinions
MISSISSIPPI CHEMICAL CORP. v. HOECHST-UHDE,338 F.2d 662(5th Cir. 1964)
MISSISSIPPI CHEMICAL CORPORATION, a Mississippi Corporation, and
Vulcan-Cincinnati, Inc., an Ohio Corporation, Appellants, v. The
HOECHST-UHDE CORPORATION, Appellee.
No. 21278.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
November 30, 1964.
Page 663
Earl T. Thomas, Harvey McGehee, Wells, Thomas Wells, Jackson, Miss., Paul W. Steer, James J. Ryan, Steer, Strauss Adair, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant Vulcan-Cincinnati, Inc.

John C. Satterfield, Satterfield, Shell, Williams Buford, Yazoo City, Miss., Satterfield, Shell, Williams Buford, John R. Bradley, Jr., Jackson, Miss., Yazoo City, Miss., of counsel, for appellant Mississippi Chemical Corp.

Frank E. Everett, Jr., of Brunini, Everett, Grantham Quin, Vicksburg, Miss., J. Kenneth Campbell, Alexander Green, New York City, of counsel, for appellee.
Before JONES and BELL, Circuit Judges, and HUNTER, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Invoking jurisdiction on the ground of diversity of citizenship, the appellant Mississippi Chemical Corporation brought an action in the District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi against the appellant Vulcan-Cincinnati, Incorporated, and Hoechst-Uhde Corporation. Jurisdiction over Hoechst-Uhde was attempted by constructive service, delivery of a summons having been made under a state statute upon the Secretary of State of the State of Mississippi. Vulcan-Cincinnati filed a cross-claim against Hoechst-Uhde. The district court relied heavily on Mississippi Wood Preserving Co. v. Rothschild, 5th Cir. 1953,201 F.2d 233, and decided that the activities of Hoechst-Uhde were not such as brought it within the Mississippi statute permitting the constructive service of process on any non-resident corporation not qualified to do business in Mississippi but "who shall do any business or perform any character of work or service in this state * * *." Code Miss. 1942, §§ 1437-1438. The opinion of the district court, reported at224 F. Supp. 11, with which we are in agreement, sets forth the reasons for its action. See also Walker v. Savell, 5th Cir., 1964,335 F.2d 536. The judgment of the district court is

Affirmed.Page 695