Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Lawrence C. Pope v. United States
Lawrence C. Pope v. United States, 398 F.2d 834 (5th Cir. 1968)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1968-07-24
- Topic
- general
PER CURIAM: The appellant’s lengthy motion to vacate sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255, was denied without a hearing. Twenty-nine grounds for relief were asserted. These were carefully reviewed and rejected by the district court in an opinion appearing at 287 F.Supp. 214. Upon a careful consideration of the voluminous record, including the trial transcript, we find no reversible error of law, nor clear error in the findings of fact. See United States v.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Lawrence C. Pope v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Authority status
- pending
- Cited by
- 8 opinions
POPE v. UNITED STATES,398 F.2d 834(5th Cir. 1968)
Lawrence C. POPE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 25589.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
July 24, 1968.
Ralph H. Harris, III, Asst. U.S. Atty., Ernest Morgan, U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for appellee.
Before TUTTLE and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge.
Upon a careful consideration of the voluminous record, including the trial transcript, we find no reversible error of law, nor clear error in the findings of fact. See United States v. Re, 2 Cir. 1967,372 F.2d 641, cert. denied388 U.S. 912,87 S.Ct. 2112,18 L.Ed.2d 1352. Delegal v. United States, 5 Cir. 1966,363 F.2d 433; United States v. Gernie, 2 Cir. 1961,287 F.2d 637, cert. denied368 U.S. 854,82 S.Ct. 91,7 L.Ed.2d 52; United States v. Schultz, 7 Cir. 1961,286 F.2d 753.
The judgment of the district court is affirmed.Page 835Page 875