Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

International Paint Company, Inc. v. M/v Mission Viking, in Rem, and A. Martin Industries, a Louisiana Corp., Manufacturers Hanover Leasing Corp., Intervenor-Appellant, Cross-Appellee v. Alexander Industries, Inc., Intervenors-Appellees, Food & Services, Inc., Intervenor-Appellee, Cross-Appellant

Int’l Paint Co. v. M/v Mission Viking, in Rem, & A. Martin Indus., a La. Corp., Mfrs. Hanover Leasing Corp., Intervenor-Appellant, Cross-Appellee v. Alexander Indus., Inc., Intervenors-Appellees, Food & Servs., Inc., Intervenor-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, 642 F.2d 160 (5th Cir. 1981)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1981-04-10
Topic
litigation

642 F.2d 160 INTERNATIONAL PAINT COMPANY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. M/V MISSION VIKING, In Rem, and A. Martin Industries, a Louisiana Corp., Defendants. MANUFACTURERS HANOVER LEASING CORP., Intervenor-Appellant, Cross-Appellee, v. ALEXANDER INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Intervenors-Appellees, Food & Services, Inc., Intervenor-Appellee, Cross-Appellant.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed International Paint Company, Inc. v. M/v Mission Viking, in Rem, and A. Martin Industries, a Louisiana Corp., Manufacturers Hanover Leasing Corp., Intervenor-Appellant, Cross-Appellee v. Alexander Industries, Inc., Intervenors-Appellees, Food & Services, Inc., Intervenor-Appellee, Cross-Appellant. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

642 F.2d 160

INTERNATIONAL PAINT COMPANY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
M/V MISSION VIKING, In Rem, and A. Martin Industries, a
Louisiana Corp., Defendants.
MANUFACTURERS HANOVER LEASING CORP., Intervenor-Appellant,
Cross-Appellee,
v.
ALEXANDER INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Intervenors-Appellees,
Food & Services, Inc., Intervenor-Appellee, Cross-Appellant.

No. 79-1965.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Unit B

April 10, 1981.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Alabama, Daniel Holcombe Thomas, Judge.

1

Abram L. Philips, Jr., Patricia K. Olney, Mobile, Ala., for defendants.

2

Jack Alltmont, New Orleans, La., for Food & Serv.

3

G. Hamp Uzzelle, III, Mobile, Ala., for Alexander, Mobile Sh. & Drew Chem.

4

J. George Whitfield, Jr., Mobile, Ala., for Int'l & Marine Supply.

5

Donald J. Stewart, Mobile, Ala., for Gulf Welding.

6

William S. Shulman, Mobile, Ala., for ITT MacKay Marine.

7

Frank G. Taylor, Mobile, Ala., for Comm. Industrial.

8

G. Sage Lyons, John Patrick Courtney, III, Mobile, Ala., for Ala. State Docks Dept.

9

Robert J. Oberfell, New Orleans, La., for Hydril Co. & Sub Sea Systems.

10

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT and VANCE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

11

Appellee Foods & Services, Inc. has moved to clarify our judgment, 637 F.2d 382, concerning pre-judgment interest.

12

The matter of pre-judgment interest is REMANDED to the district court.