Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
In the Matter of Elray and Jean Rash, Debtors. Associates Commercial Corporation v. Elray Rash and Jean E. Rash
In the Matter of Elray & Jean Rash, Debtors. Assocs. Commercial Corp. v. Elray Rash & Jean E. Rash, 68 F.3d 113 (5th Cir. 1995)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1995-10-18
- Topic
- real-estate
*114 ON SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING, JOLLY, DAVIS, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. * BY THE COURT: A member of the court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed In the Matter of Elray and Jean Rash, Debtors. Associates Commercial Corporation v. Elray Rash and Jean E. Rash. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 10 opinions
Rebecca A. Leigh, Houston, TX, for Amicus Curiae, MBCC.
Pamela A. Bassel, Dabney D. Bassel, Law, Snakard Gambill, P.C., Ft. Worth, TX, Erin B. Shank, Nationsbank of Texas, N.A., Dallas, TX, for Nationsbank.
Robert E. Barron, Nederaland, TX, John J. Durkay, Mehaffy Weber, Beaumont, TX, for appellee.
Norma L. Hammes, James J. Gold, San Jose, CA, for Amicus Curiae, National Assoc. of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys.
[4] IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.
- Judges Garwood, Higginbotham and Jones are recused and did not participate in this decision. ↩