Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
In Re K. M. A., Inc., Bankrupt. K. M. A., Inc. v. General Motors Acceptance Corporation
652 F.2d 398
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1981-07-16
- Topic
- bankruptcy
holding that non-attorney sole stockholder of corporation could not proceed pro se on behalf of the corporation | holding that corporation’s notice of appeal shall be accepted if attorney enters appearance on corporation’s behalf within 30 days, but dismissed if no attorney enters appearance | holding that bankruptcy appeal could not be brought by non-attorney on behalf of corporation | giving appellant thirty days to retain counsel, when appellant was represented by counsel at the lower court, and attempted to file its appeal pro se | ordering a conditional dismissal of 20 a corporation’s notice of appeal filed by someone who is not an attorney unless the corporation obtains counsel within thirty days | granting a corporation additional time to obtain counsel before dismissing an appeal complete ly | “The law is clear that a corporation as a fictional legal person can only be represented by licensed counsel.” | “The law is clear that a corporation as a fictional legal person can only be represented by licensed counsel.” | “This is so even when the person seeking to represent the corporation is its president and major stockholder.” (citation omitted) | “A fictional legal person can only be represented by licensed counsel.”
Citator
- Cited by
- 36 opinions
William F. Beemer, Orlando, Fla., for General Motors Acceptance Corp.Page 399
[2] In January 1980 when the trustee was about to pay General Motors Acceptance Corporation's claim arising from the Chapter X reorganization of K.M.A., Inc., K.M.A., by and through an attorney, filed an objection to the claim. After a trial, the bankruptcy court denied the objection. On appeal to the district court where K.M.A., Inc. was represented by counsel, relief to K.M.A., Inc. was denied. On April 20, 1981, the sole stockholder of K.M.A., Inc., a non-attorney, filed a notice of appeal for the corporation from the district court's adverse holding. He seeks to proceedpro seon behalf of the corporation.
[3] The law is clear that a corporation as a fictional legal person can only be represented by licensed counsel.CommercialRailroad Bank of Vicksburg v. Slocomb,39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 60,10 L.Ed. 354(1840);In re Victor Publishers, Inc.,545 F.2d 285(1st Cir. 1976). This is so even when the person seeking to represent the corporation is its president and major stockholder.In re Las Colinas Development Corp.,585 F.2d 7(1st Cir. 1978).
[4] It is not clear, however, whether the filing of the corporation's notice of appeal by someone who is not an attorney is sufficient to deprive this Court of its jurisdiction to consider the appeal.Compare Strong Delivery MinistryAssociation v. Board of Appeals of Cook County,543 F.2d 32(7th Cir. 1976),and In re Highley,459 F.2d 554(9th Cir. 1972),with DeVilliers v. Atlas Corp.,360 F.2d 292(10th Cir. 1966). We are mindful of the emphasis placed on flexibility and substance rather than form in the appellate rules,seeFed.R.App.P.3(c),26(b). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that General Motors Acceptance Corporation's motion to dismiss is hereby GRANTED, unless within 30 days of the entry of this order an attorney admitted to practice before this Court files an appearance to represent the corporate appellant, in which event the appeal shall not be dismissed.
[5] DISMISSED.