Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

In re Benjamin Moore & Co.

In re Benjamin Moore & Co., 309 F.3d 296 (5th Cir. 2002)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
2002-10-04
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • suggesting that “misjoinder . . . should not be allowed to defeat diversity jurisdiction” and citing Tapscott, 77 F.3d at 1360
  • "[I]t might be concluded that misjoinder of plaintiffs should not be allowed to defeat diversity jurisdiction.”
  • “Thus, without detracting from the force of the Tapscott principle that fraudulent misjoinder of plaintiffs is no more permissible than fraudulent misjoinder of defendants to circumvent diversity jurisdiction, we do not reach its application in this case.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed In re Benjamin Moore & Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
43 opinions