Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Federal Power Commission

266 F.2d 235

Type: Opinion
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1959-06-03
Topic: general

*236JONES, Circuit Judge. This is a companion case to the four cases decided today which are styled Sun Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 266 F.2d 222; Hunt Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 266 F.2d 232; Magnolia Petroleum Company v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 266 F.2d 234; and Richardson v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Federal Power Commission. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 8 opinions

HUMBLE OIL REFINING CO. v. FED. POWER COM'N,266 F.2d 235(5th Cir. 1959)

HUMBLE OIL REFINING COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION,

Respondent.

No. 17128.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

April 17, 1959.

Rehearing Denied June 3, 1959.

Petition for Review of Orders of the Federal Power Commission.

W.J. Merrill, Washington, D.C., Carl Illig, William H. Holloway, Houston, Tex., E.W. Montgomery, II, Jackson, Miss. (Nelson Jones, Houston, Tex., on the brief), for intervenor.

Howie, Howie Montgomery, Jackson, Miss., on the brief for intervenors.

M.M. McGowan, Jackson, Miss., pro se. (Wright, Overstreet, Kuykendall Perry, Jackson, Miss., on the brief).

Willard W. Gatchell, Gen. Counsel, Howard E. Wahrenbrock, Solicitor, William W. Ross, Atty., Federal Power Comm., Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before TUTTLE, JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges.Page 236

JONES, Circuit Judge.

This is a companion case to the four cases decided today which are styled Sun Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir.,266 F.2d 222; Hunt Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir.,266 F.2d 232; Magnolia Petroleum Company v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir.,266 F.2d 234; and Richardson v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir.,266 F.2d 233.

The facts in this case are not different in any material respect from those in Sun Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, supra. For the reasons assigned in the opinion in that case, the orders of the Federal Power Commission are

Affirmed.

JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge (dissenting).

For dissenting opinion see Sun Oil Company v. Federal Power Commission, 5 Cir., 1959,266 F.2d 222,227.

Rehearing denied: JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge, dissenting.