Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Harry R. Graham and Thelma Graham v. W. Randolph Hodges, H. v. Gibson and Edward G. Little

Harry R. Graham & Thelma Graham v. W. Randolph Hodges, H. v. Gibson & Edward G. Little, 374 F.2d 340 (5th Cir. 1967)

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1967-05-08
Topic
bankruptcy

PER CURIAM: The issues in this appeal are identical to those presented in the companion case of Felton v. Hodges, 5 Cir., 374 F.2d 337, decided this day, and the decision here is controlled by the views expressed therein. The judgment is affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Harry R. Graham and Thelma Graham v. W. Randolph Hodges, H. v. Gibson and Edward G. Little. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

GRAHAM v. HODGES,374 F.2d 340(5th Cir. 1967)
Harry R. GRAHAM and Thelma Graham, Appellants, v. W. Randolph HODGES, H.V.
Gibson and Edward G. Little, Appellees.
No. 23486.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 22, 1967.
Rehearing Denied May 8, 1967.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; Emett C. Choate, Judge.
William B. Seidel, Fort Lauderdale, Fla., Henry R. Carr, Miami, Fla., for appellants.

Earl Faircloth, Atty. Gen., Sam Spector, Robert A. Chastain, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tallahassee, Fla., for appellees.
Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, WISDOM, Circuit Judge, and BREWSTER, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The issues in this appeal are identical to those presented in the companion case of Felton v. Hodges, 5 Cir.,374 F.2d 337, decided this day, and the decision here is controlled by the views expressed therein.
The judgment is affirmed.Page 341
Page 356