Opinion · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Greenville Shipbuilding Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

460 F.2d 1063

Type
Opinion
Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1972-06-20
Topic
general

PER CURIAM: We are in agreement with the well reasoned opinion of the district court, Greenville Shipbuilding Corp. v. Hartford Ace. & Ind. Co., 334 F.Supp. 1228 (1971), and its judgment is affirmed.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Greenville Shipbuilding Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
GREENVILLE SHIPBUILDING v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT,460 F.2d 1063(5th Cir. 1972)
GREENVILLE SHIPBUILDING CORP. ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE HARTFORD
ACCIDENT INDEMNITY COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.
No. 71-3629.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 20, 1972.
J. Murray Akers, Robertshaw, Merideth Swank, Greenville, Miss., for plaintiffs-appellants.

James L. Robertson, Greenville, Miss., for defendant-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi; Orma R. Smith, Judge.
Before WISDOM and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges, and BOOTLE, District Judgefn*.
PER CURIAM:
[1] We are in agreement with the well reasoned opinion of the district court, Greenville Shipbuilding Corp. v. Hartford Acc. Ind. Co.,334 F. Supp. 1228(1971), and its judgment is affirmed.
  1. Hon. W. A. Bootle, U.S. District Judge, sitting by designation. ↩